RAS PhysicsГеомагнетизм и аэрономия Geomagnetism and Aeronomy

  • ISSN (Print) 0016-7940
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5022

Analysis of Spectra of Solar Wind Magnetic Field Components Fluctuations Across Fast Reverse Interplanetary Shocks

PII
S3034502225050053-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034502225050053
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 65 / Issue number 5
Pages
610-619
Abstract
Fluctuations in the values of the IMF components of the solar wind plasma near the front of a fast reverse shock were analyzed using the WIND satellite data with a time resolution of 11 Hz. Two ways of dividing the magnetic field vector into components were considered: according to the GSE coordinate system and relative to the normal of the interplanetary shock front. It was found that the break frequency of the fluctuation spectrum of magnetic field components in the solar wind upstream region lies in the frequency range from 0.37 to 1.37 Hz. In the solar wind downstream region, the break frequency shifts to the range of 0.45–1.58 Hz, which corresponds to the scale of the proton inertial length. The slope of the fluctuation spectra of the IMF components was shown to vary both on MHD and on transient scales, although to different degrees. On transient scales, the difference can be significant.
Keywords
солнечный ветер плазма магнитное поле турбулентность спектр мощности ударная волна
Date of publication
25.03.2026
Year of publication
2026
Number of purchasers
0
Views
27

References

  1. 1. Рязанцева М.О., Рахманова Л.С., Ермолаев Ю.И., Лодкина И.Г., Застенков Г.Н., Чесалин Л.С. Характеристики турбулентного потока солнечного ветра в областях компрессии плазмы // Космические исследования. Т. 58. № 6. С. 503–512. 2020. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0023420620060096
  2. 2. Сапунова О.В., Бородкова Н.Л., Застенков Г.Н. Анализ спектров флуктуаций величины потока плазмы и модуля магнитного поля на обратных ударных волнах // Солнечно-земная физика. Т. 10. № 3. С. 62–69. 2024. https://doi.org/10.12737/szf-103202407
  3. 3. Bruno R., Carbone V. The solar wind as a turbulence laboratory // Living Rev. Solar Phys. V. 10. № 1. ID 2. 2013. https://doi.org/10.12942/lrsp-2013-2
  4. 4. Howes G.G., Cowley S.C., Dorland W., Hammett G.W., Quataert E., Schekochihin A.A. A model of turbulence in magnetized plasmas: Implications for the dissipation range in the solar wind // J. Geophys. Res. – Space. V. 113. № 5. ID A05103. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JA012665
  5. 5. Kolmogorov A.N. A refinement of previous hypotheses concerning the local structure of turbulence in a viscous incompressible fluid at high Reynolds number // J. Fluid Mech. V. 13. № 1. P. 82–85. 1962. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112062000518
  6. 6. Leamon R.J., Matthaeus W.H., Smith C.W., Zank G.P., Mullan D.J., Oughton S. MHD-driven kinetic dissipation in the solar wind and corona // Astrophys. J. V. 537. № 2. P. 1054–1062. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1086/309059
  7. 7. Lepping R.P., Acũna M.H., Burlaga L.F. et al. The WIND magnetic field investigation // Space Sci. Rev. V. 71. № 1–4. P. 207–229. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00751330
  8. 8. Lin R.P., Anderson K.A., Ashford S. et al. A three-dimensional plasma and energetic particle experiment for the WIND spacecraft // Space Sci. Rev. V. 71. № 1–4. P. 125–153. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00751328
  9. 9. Matthaeus W.H., Weygand J.M., Dasso S. Ensemble space-time correlation of plasma turbulence in the solar wind // Phys. Rev. Lett. V. 116. ID 245101. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.245101
  10. 10. Ogilvie K.W., Chornay D.J., Fritzenreiter R.J. et al. SWE, a comprehensive plasma instrument for the Wind spacecraft // Space Sci. Rev. V. 71. № 1–4. P. 55–77. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00751326
  11. 11. Oliveira D.M. Magnetohydrodynamic shocks in the interplanetary space: a theoretical review // Braz. J. Phys. V. 47. № 1. P. 81–95. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13538-016-0472-x
  12. 12. Park B., Pitňa A., Šafránková J., Němeček Z., Krupařová O., Krupař V., Zhao L., Silwal A. Change of spectral properties of magnetic field fluctuations across different types of interplanetary shocks // Astrophys. J. Lett. V. 954. № 2. ID 51. 2023. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acf4ff
  13. 13. Pitňa A., Šafránková J., Němeček Z., Ďurovcová T., Kis A. Turbulence upstream and downstream of interplanetary shocks // Front. Phys. V. 8. ID 626768. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.626768
  14. 14. Schekochihin A.A., Cowley S.C., Dorland W., Hammett G.W., Howes G.G., Quataert E., Tatsuno T. Astrophysical gyrokinetics: kinetic and fluid turbulent cascades in magnetized weakly collisional plasmas // Astrophys. J. Suppl. S. V. 182. № 1. P. 310–377. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/182/1/310
  15. 15. Smith C.W., Mullan D.J., Ness N.F., Skoug R.M., Steinberg J. Day the solar wind almost disappeared: Magnetic field fluctuations, wave refraction and dissipation // J. Geophys. Res. – Space. V. 106. № 9. P. 18625–18634. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA000022
  16. 16. Zhao L.-L., Zank G.P., He J.S. et al. Turbulence and wave transmission at an ICME-driven shock observed by the Solar Orbiter and Wind // Astron. Astrophys. V. 656. ID A3. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140450
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library