Везде

RAS PhysicsГеомагнетизм и аэрономия Geomagnetism and Aeronomy

  • ISSN (Print) 0016-7940
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5022

All-Russian Reconciliation of Observatory Magnetometers at the Borok Geophysical Observatory

You can
PII
S3034502225060137-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034502225060137
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
R. V. Sidorov
  • Affiliation: Geophysical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (GC RAS)
D. V. Kudin
  • Affiliation: Geophysical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (GC RAS)
S. Yu. Khomutov
  • Affiliation: Institute of Cosmophysical Research and Radio Wave Propagation, Far Eastern Branch of RAS (IKIR FEB RAS)
S. V. Anisimov
  • Affiliation: Borok Geophysical Observatory of the Schmidt Institute of physics of the Earth of RAS
A. A. Soloviev
  • Affiliation:
    Geophysical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (GC RAS)
    Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth of RAS (IPE RAS)
B. M. Nasyrtdinov
  • Affiliation: Kazan Federal University (KFU)
L. A. Murayev
  • Affiliation: Bulashevich Institute of Geophysics, Ural Branch of RAS (IG UB RAS)
M. V. Prikop
  • Affiliation: Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Siberian Branch of RAS (ISTP SB RAS)
A. V. Vertiprakhova
  • Affiliation: Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Siberian Branch of RAS (ISTP SB RAS)
V. V. Khokhlova
  • Affiliation: Mining Institute of the Ural Branch of RAS (MI UB RAS)
A. A. Yegoshin
  • Affiliation: Institute of Geosphere Dynamics of RAS (IDG RAS)
Volume/ Edition
Volume 65 / Issue number 6
Pages
925-942
Abstract
This article presents cross-checking the reconciliation of the magnetometers from the Russian observatories carried out in September 2024 at the Borok Geophysical Observatory of the IPE RAS (Yaroslavl Region). The event brought together Russian magnetologists from observatories in Kamchatka, Siberia, the Urals and the European part of Russia. Over the course of two days, the workshop participants performed the required measurements with the magnetometers they brought and provided numerical estimates of their main metrological parameters. The obtained results will allow geomagnetic observatories to conduct magnetic measurements of the highest quality in accordance with the international INTERMAGNET standard. As part of the scientific program of the event, leading Russian magnetologists shared the results of their research using observatory data and discussed the current state, problems and prospects for the development of the domestic network of stationary geomagnetic observations.
Keywords
магнитометр магнитная обсерватория сверка магнитометров абсолютные магнитные измерения
Date of publication
24.07.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
12

References

  1. 1. Воробьев А.В., Соловьев А.А., Пилипенко В.А. и др. Локальная диагностика наличия полярных сияний на основе интеллектуального анализа геомагнитных данных // Солнечно-земная физика. Т. 9. № 2. С. 26–34. 2023. https://doi.org/10.12737/szf-92202303
  2. 2. Качановский Ю.М., Алексеева А.В., Денисова В.Н. и др. Руководство по ионосферным, магнитным и гелиогеофизическим наблюдениям. Часть II. Магнитные наблюдения. М.: Федеральная служба по гидрометеорологии и мониторингу окружающей среды (Росгидромет), 192 с. 2020.
  3. 3. Краснопёров Р.И., Сидоров Р.В., Соловьёв А.А. Инструкция по выполнению абсолютных измерений феррозондовым деклинометром/инклинометром. ред. 2.3, ноябрь 2019 г. М.: ГЦ РАН, 26 с. 2019.
  4. 4. Кудин Д.В., Соловьев А.А., Сидоров Р.В и др. Система ускоренной подготовки квазиокончательных данных стандарта INTERMAGNET // Геомагнетизм и аэрономия. Т. 61. № 1. С. 46–59. 2021. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0016794021010090
  5. 5. Ладынин А.В., Попова А.А., Семаков Н.Н. Векторные магнитные измерения с феррозондовыми теодолитами. Методическое пособие. Новосибирск: Новосибирский гос. ун-т, 89 с. 2005.
  6. 6. Нечаев С.А. Руководство для стационарных геомагнитных наблюдений. Иркутск: Изд-во Института географии им. В.Б. Сочавы СО РАН, 140 с. 2006.
  7. 7. Соловьев А.А., Сидоров Р.В., Кудин Д.В. Автоматизированный расчет квази-окончательных данных. 2015. URL: http://geomag.gcras.ru/materials-man.html
  8. 8. Agayan S.M., Bogoutdinov S.R., Sidorov R.V. et al. Regression derivatives and their application in the study of magnetic storms // Russ. J. Earth Sci. № 6. P. 1–22. 2023. https://doi.org/10.2205/2023ES000889
  9. 9. Alken P., Thebault E., Beggan C.D. et al. International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the thirteenth generation // Earth Planets Space. V. 73. Pp. 49–58. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-020-01288-x
  10. 10. Chulliat A., Anisimov S. The Borok INTERMAGNET magnetic observatory // Russ. J. Earth. Sci. № 10. P. 1–7. 2008. https://doi.org/10.2205/2007ES000238
  11. 11. Chulliat A., Brown W., Alken P. et al. The US/UK World Magnetic Model for 2020–2025: Technical Report. USA: National Centers for Environmental Information, NOAA, 2020. https://doi.org/10.25923/ytk1-yx35
  12. 12. Gvishiani A., Soloviev A. Observations. Modeling and Systems Analysis in Geomagnetic Data Interpretation. Switzerland: Springer Nature. 311 p., 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58969-1
  13. 13. Hegymegi L., Hegymegi C., Domján A. Operation manual of FluxSet declination/inclination magnetometer. Budapest: MinGeo, 15 p., 2018.
  14. 14. Jankowski J., Sucksdorff C. Guide for magnetic measurements and observatory practice. Warsaw: International Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 235 p., 1996.
  15. 15. Kring Lauridsen E. Experiences with the DI-Fluxgate magnetometer: inclusive theory of the instrument and comparison with other methods. Copenhagen: Danish Meteorological Institute, 23 p., 1985.
  16. 16. Love J.J., Chulliat A. An international network of magnetic observatories // Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union V. 94. № 42. P. 373–374. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013e0420001
  17. 17. Mandea M., Korte M. Geomagnetic Observations and Models. Netherlands: Springer, 344 p. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9858-0
  18. 18. Newitt L.R., Barton C.E., Bitterly J. Guide for Magnetic Repeat Station Surveys. Boulder, CO: International Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 129 p., 1996.
  19. 19. Meyers H., Davis W.M. A profile of the geomagnetic model user and abuser // J. Geomag. Geoelectr. V. 42. № 9. P. 1079–1085. 1990. https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.42.1079
  20. 20. Sidorov R., Soloviev A., Krasnoperov R., Kudin D., Grudnev A., Kopytenko Y., Kotikov A., Sergushin P. Saint Petersburg magnetic observatory: From Voelkovo subdivision to INTERMAGNET certification // Geosci. Instrum. Methods Data Syst. V. 6. № 2. P. 473–485. 2017. https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-473-2017
  21. 21. Soloviev A.A., Kudin D.V., Sidorov R.V., Koitkov A.L. Detection of the 2020 geomagnetic jerk using near real-time data from the “St. Petersburg” and “Klimovskaya” magnetic observatories // Dokl. Earth Sci. V. 507. P. 925–929. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X22700477
  22. 22. St-Louis B. INTERMAGNET Operations Committee, INTERMAGNET Executive Council (2024): INTERMAGNET Technical Reference Manual, Version 5.1.1, (INTERMAGNET). Potsdam: GFZ Data Services, 134 p., 2024.
  23. 23. Thebault E., Finlay C.C., Toh H. Special issue “International Geomagnetic Reference Field – the twelfth generation” // Earth Planets Space. V. 67. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-015-0313-0
  24. 24. Turner G.M., Rasson J.L., Reeves C.V. Observation and Measurement Techniques, In: Schubert, G. (ed) Treatise on Geophysics. V. 5: Geomagnetism. Elsevier, P. 93–146. 2007.
  25. 25. Worthington E.W., Matzka J. U.S. Geological Survey experience with the residual absolutes method // Geosci. Instrum. Methods Data Syst. № 6. P. 419–427. 2017. https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-6-419-2017
QR
Translate

Indexing

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library