- PII
- 10.31857/S0016794024050046-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0016794024050046
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 64 / Issue number 5
- Pages
- 635-648
- Abstract
- In this study, we consider historical geomagnetic satellite data obtained during a strong magnetic storm on March 8−9, 1970. In addition to the data of the Soviet satellite Kosmos-321, data from the American satellite OGO-6, which performed geomagnetic measurements at the same time, were used. We analyzed time variations of external magnetic fields recorded in satellite and ground-based observations of the magnetic field. The research also gave impetus to the creation of the improved software implementation of the auroral oval model APM, which enables reconstruction of its position and precipitation intensity in both the past and near real time. The magnetic variations originating in the near-Earth space from various sources were identified. In particular, we revealed the signatures of the storm-time ring current and equatorial and auroral electrojects. The paper highlights the enduring value of historical data of magnetic field observations stored in data centers and continuously digitized by their staff.
- Keywords
- внешнее магнитное поле морфология возмущений моделирование аврорального овала спутниковые наблюдения исторические данные
- Date of publication
- 15.10.2024
- Year of publication
- 2024
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 49
References
- 1. Воробьев А.В., Пилипенко В.А., Решетников А.Г., Воробьева Г.Р., Белов М.Д. Веб-ориентированная визуализация геофизических параметров в области аврорального овала // Научная визуализация. Т. 12. № 3. С. 108–118. 2020. https://doi.org/10.26583/sv.12.3.10
- 2. Воробьев А.В., Соловьев А.А., Пилипенко В.А., Воробьева Г.Р. Интерактивная компьютерная модель для прогноза и анализа полярных сияний // Солнечно-земная физика. Т. 8. № 2. С. 93–100. 2022. https://doi.org/10.12737/szf-82202213
- 3. Долгинов Ш.Ш., Жигалов Л.Н., Струнникова Л.В., Фельдштейн Я.И., Черевко Т.Н., Шарова В.А. Магнитная буря 8-10 марта 1970 г. по наблюдениям на спутнике “Космос-321” и на поверхности Земли. I. Морфология возмущения // Геомагнетизм и аэрономия. Т. 12. № 6. С. 1046–1058. 1972.
- 4. Долгинов Ш.Ш., Козлов А.Н., Колесова В.И. и др. Каталог измеренных и вычисленных значений модуля напряженности геомагнитного поля вдоль орбит спутника “Космос-321”. М.: Наука, 179 c. 1976.
- 5. Долгинов Ш.Ш., Наливайко В.И., Тюрмин А.В., Чинчевой М.М., Бродская Р.Е., Злотин Г.Н., Кикнадзе И.Н., Тюрмина Л.О. Каталог измеренных и вычисленных значений модуля напряженности геомагнитного поля вдоль орбит спутника “Космос-49”. 24 октября – 4 ноября. Ред. В.П. Орлов. М.: ИЗМИРАН (в 3-х томах). 1967.
- 6. Ермолаев Ю.И., Ермолаев М.Ю., Лодкина И.Г., Николаева Н.С. Статистическое исследование гелиосферных условий, приводящих к магнитным бурям // Космич. исслед. Т. 45. № 1. С. 3-11. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952507010017
- 7. Соловьев А.А. Некоторые задачи геомагнетизма, решаемые по данным наземных и спутниковых наблюдений // Геология и геофизика. Т. 64. № 9. С. 1330–1356. 2023. https://doi.org/10.15372/GiG2023112
- 8. Alken P., Thébault E., Beggan C.D. et al. International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the thirteenth generation // Earth, Planets and Space. V. 73. № 49. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-020-01288-x
- 9. Cain J.C., Hendricks S.J., Hudson W.V., Langel R.A. A proposed model for the international geomagnetic reference field-1965 // J. Geomagn. Geoelectr. V. 19. № 4. P. 335–355. 1967. https://doi.org/10.5636/jgg.19.335
- 10. Formisano V. On the March 7–8, 1970, event // J. Geophys. Res.:Space Physics. V. 78. № 7. P. 1198–1202. 1973. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA078i007p01198
- 11. Friis-Christensen E., Lühr H., Hulot G. Swarm: A constellation to study the Earth’s magnetic field // Earth, Planets and Space. V. 58. № 4. P. 351–358. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03351933
- 12. Holme R., James M.A., Lühr H. Magnetic field modelling from scalar-only data: Resolving the Backus effect with the equatorial electrojet // Earth, Planets and Space. V. 57. № 12. P. 1203–1209. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1186/BF03351905
- 13. Jackson J.E., Vette J.I. OGO Program Summary. Washington, D.C., USA: NASA, 330 р. 1975.
- 14. Khokhlov A., Hulot G., Le Mouel J.-L. On the Backus effect—I // Geophys. J. Int. V. 130. № 3. P. 701–703. 1997. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb01864.x
- 15. Kozyreva O.V., Pilipenko V.A., Soloviev A.A., Engebretson M. J. Virtual magnetograms - a tool for the study of geomagnetic response to the solar wind/IMF driving // Russ. J. Earth Sci. V. 19. № 2. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2205/2019ES000654
- 16. Krasnoperov R., Peregoudov D., Lukianova R., Soloviev A., Dzeboev B. Early Soviet satellite magnetic field measurements in the years 1964 and 1970 // Earth Syst. Sci. Data. V. 12. № 1. P. 555–561. 2020. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-555-2020
- 17. Love J.J., Chulliat A. An international network of magnetic observatories // Eos. V. 94. № 42. P. 373–374. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013EO420001
- 18. Lühr H., Maus S., Rother M. Noon-time equatorial electrojet: its spatial features as determined by the CHAMP satellite // J. Geophys. Res. V. 109. № A1. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009656
- 19. Mandea M. Magnetic satellite missions: where have we been and where are we going? // Cr. Geoscience. V. 338. № 14–15. P. 1002–1011. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crte.2006.05.011
- 20. Meng X., Tsurutani B.T., Mannucci A.J. The solar and interplanetary causes of superstorms (minimum Dst ≤ −250 nT) during the space age // J. of Geophys. Res.: Space Physics. V. 124. № 6. P. 3926–3948. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JA026425
- 21. Newell P.T., Liou K., Zhang Y., Sotirelis T., Paxton L.J., Mitchell E. J. OVATION Prime-2013: Extension of auroral precipitation model to higher disturbance levels // Space Weather. V. 12. № 6. P. 368–379. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014SW001056
- 22. Olsen N., Hulot G., Sabaka T.J. Measuring the Earth’s Magnetic Field from Space: Concepts of Past, Present and Future Missions // Space Sci. Rev. V. 155. P. 65–93. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-010-9676-5
- 23. Petrov V.G., Krasnoperov R.I. The aspects of K-index calculation at Russian Geomagnetic Observatories // Russ. J. Earth Sci. V. 20. № 6. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2205/2020ES000724
- 24. Skuridin G.A. Mastery of outer space in the USSR, 1957–1967 (translation of “Osvoyeniye kosmicheskogo Prostranstva v SSSR, 1957–1967”, Moscow, “Nauka” Press, 1971). Washington, D.C., USA: NASA. 1975.
- 25. Soloviev A.A., Peregoudov D.V. Verification of the geomagnetic field models using historical satellite measurements obtained in 1964 and 1970 // Earth, Planets and Space. V. 74. № 187. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-022-01749-5
- 26. Stern D.P., Bredekamp J.H. Error enhancement in geomagnetic models derived from scalar data // J. Geophys. Res. V. 80. № 13. P. 1776–1782. 1975. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA080i013p01776
- 27. Vorobev A.V., Pilipenko V.A., Krasnoperov R.I., Vorobeva G.R., Lorentzen D.A. Short-term forecast of the auroral oval position on the basis of the “virtual globe” technology // Russ. J. Earth Sci. V. 20. № 6. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2205/2020ES000721
- 28. Vorobev A.V., Soloviev A.A., Pilipenko V.A., Vorobeva G.R. Internet application for interactive visualization of geophysical and space data: approach, architecture, technologies // Journal of the Earth and Space Physics. V. 48. № 4. P. 151–160. 2023. https://doi.org/10.22059/jesphys.2023.350281.1007467
- 29. Vorobjev V.G., Yagodkina O.I., Katkalov Yu.V. Auroral Precipitation Model and its applications to ionospheric and magnetospheric studies // J. Atmos. Sol.- Terr. Phys. V. 102. P. 157–171. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.05.007
- 30. Yamazaki Y., Maute A. Sq and EEJ – A Review on the Daily Variation of the Geomagnetic Field Caused by Ionospheric Dynamo Currents // Space Sci. Rev. V. 206. P. 299–405. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-016-0282-z
